Apr 5, 2021
LETS
“Bitch or Buck?” “Let’s fuck.” Fuck, LETS! Local Economic Trading Systems. Let’s remove them, let’s replace them, let’s destroy them, let’s rebuild them. National Stock Market, The Totnes Pound, Quid Pro Quo, freedom for West County!
The whole of North Devon has to be replaced, let us replace that, let us replace it, let us reconstruct the whole. We MUST replace ALL of that, ALL! So let’s take a stand, let’s stop this nonsense. Let’s stop this false democracy! Let’s say YES! Let’s SAY YES! To freedom, let us say YES! This whole mess, all of it, ALL of it, WE MUST SAY NO! What a mess! Let us do a deal with the Tories and Labour, let us do a deal with the BNP and the NFU, let us replace it all, and replace it all! Let’s have the whole of North Devon replaced! And replace the whole of North Devon with it! Let’s do a deal with our enemies, let’s do a deal with the CND and The PNU and the NFU! So let’s take a stand, let’s stop this nonsense. Let’s stop this false democracy! Let’s say YES! Let’s SAY YES! To freedom, let us say YES! This whole mess, all of it, ALL of it, WE MUST SAY NO!
YES & NO! What a mess! Democracy a sess-pit. ALL of it!
You see, The Left has seen devastating effects in The UK since the decline of The Union Movement, since this social dynamic is the site of true democracy. We may be in a position to destroy the Union, but to win it back, it is a necessity for us to destroy The Left, as it represents the true and unspoken power of the Establishment, that power that is ultimately derived from a common desire to maintain the status quo of what exists, and to preserve the status quo of what was for over 500 years, and has been for hundreds of years, a commonwealth.
Now what?
I say destroy the Left.
What do I mean by destroy it? Well… I mean to dismantle it, because that is what the Left is built on. It is also in part what makes it a cancer of the state, and I would love to see that eradicated, too. I’ve made efforts to do so over the years in the UK, with my taking advantage of The NHS. And it has paid dividends.
We have a few left-wing ideas, but the left is the Left and it won’t come, for whatever reason, unharmed, unassimilated, unquestioned. It will not come because it has run its course and the nation doesn’t deserve it. No, it deserves it because it may just serve a higher power, a true power that is far greater than it. It serves the true powers in a way no other force does. It is the key point of the whole social contract, of the whole idea of our society. And you need to destroy it, no matter the cost.
So we’re going to destroy the Left, and not have it return.
So that’s what we’re going to do.
So, how do We dismantle The Left? We privatise all public assets (except The NHS — which needs to always be taken advantage of), which, in turn, allows the Free Market to foot the bill whilst technology improves their outcomes. But, what to do when there is an opposition whose goal is the destruction of the Free Market? The only answer is to take things into our own hands. We then create a society based on the principles of liberty, the rule of law and self-determination. Self-determination is the struggle of God Himself. When this happens, what else will we do? Well, since we are free, then we are free to do more.
This will lead us into even more interesting territory. How can the Free Market work in the social sphere? Well, let us assume that you’re the government. What would you do if there was a mob that wanted to burn the library? Probably you’d start a fire brigade. It wouldn’t be an entirely perfect solution, and it’s also not something the Free Market would allow you to do.
But, with an open society, it will become much more likely. Imagine the political process going down the same route. We know the government isn’t going to be a completely perfect tool for this, since you have to follow the law in the social sphere, but there will be enough to make you the least bad option. You have a massive army, it isn’t as far reaching as the government’s, and it doesn’t come with the social stigma of being the enemy of the people, but with the Free Market, we could have a government as a force for the good of humanity and liberty.
And the problem I have with this is that no matter what I do, taking advantage of The NHS as I am, there are a few different versions of me. One of those versions is me doing what a good politician should do. If the government is doing a good job in the social sphere, I’ll look to do that in the political sphere. Now, that’s not that different, but it means we are forced to have two different types of version of me. So this brings us into what I would call a third party in the social sphere. Think of it like a “social engineer”, someone who has a certain “knowledge” of how society should be run, and is able to use it to create a different version of you. It also means we will have to have social engineers in the political sphere, like an economist. I won’t go into what exactly this means here.
The problem I have with it is, if the politicians of the world use this ability, you’ll only have a few different versions of me in existence, but if you create a free market, you will have a majority. A majority of us, of people.
Now, Big Tech. is Big Gov. and centre-right ideologues are the leaders. I am a centre-right ideologue and a libertarian in terms of taxation and social issues. I support a strong welfare state, and an income tax to fund social welfare, however, because it supports “the State-sponsored subject of control”, the sine qua non ideologue. However, I don’t support the control of individual freedom. Because it is against the principle of individual liberty and freedom of association.
The individual may be an individual, an association may be an association. So in an association we may be free to be members of the association as individuals, but we may also be forced to comply with the requirements of the association as individuals. These requirements may be imposed on us as individuals by those individuals which may be called the State.
And here I must ask, did the State ever control an individual without the consent of the individual? Yes, it did. Because a free association may be coerced by an individual or group which may be called the State.
And in an association the individuals might be coerced by those individuals or groups calling the State the State. Because we are members of the association and we must comply with the requirements of the association as members. Not necessarily the State. Call it the social contract.
So what happened to the individual? The individual lost his individuality, he became a part of an authority called the State. And the State is a totalitarian organization that may forcibly control an individual, or group, or whatever, as an individual or group. Because the State does not control the individual, but is just another agent of the State. For example, the police work directly for The Crown.
But here is where the individual has lost his individual freedom. We are not in the individual realm. We are in the State realm. We are part of a totalitarian organization of the State called the State.
And that’s where we lose our individuality. Because if we are not in the State realm, if we are not members of the State bureaucracy, we are not our own rulers, we are just an appendage of the State.
And the State is a totalitarian organization that can force an individual to submit to whatever it wants him to submit to.
That’s where we lose our individuality. And if we don’t take the measures necessary to regain our individuality, to regain our freedom, then what can we call ourselves? It becomes something not our own. It becomes something that we cannot even recognize, can’t even realize what it is.
“Bitch or Buck?” “Let’s fuck.”
LETS.
